In Maulvi Tameezuddin vs. Governor General of Pakistan (PLD 1955 F.C. 240 case, the Governor General claimed that the section 223-A is not a law, as a new clause in the Act requires ___ the assent of Governor General. The matter was decided by:
Chief Court Baluchistan
Chief Court Sindh
Peshawar High Court
Punjab High Court
132.
The bench of Federal Court was headed by Chief Justice __ in case of Maulvi Tameez-ud-Din vs. Governor General of Pakistan.
Muhammad Akram
Muhammad Aslam
Muhammad Munir
None of them
133.
The case of Maulvi Tameez-ud-din vs. Governor General of Pakistan was reported in
PLD1957
PLD1965
PLD 1955
PLD1959
134.
In Maulvi Tameez-ud-din case, Federal Court __ the decision of Chief Court of Sindh.
Accepted
Revoked
Suspended
Both B and C
135.
The Section 223-A which was put into the government of India act 1935, was ___ due to non-assent of the governor general.
Valid
Invalid
Void
Both (B) and (C)
136.
___ was/were filed by Maulvi Tameez-ud-din to redress his grievance.
Writ of Mandamus
Writ of Quo Warranto
Both (A) and (B)
None of these
137.
Maulvi Tameez-ud-Din filed the writ petition in the chief court Sindh under Section of the government of India act 1935.
223 A
223 C
223 B
None of these
138.
Maulvi Tameez-ud-din filed a writ petition before
The Chief Court Punjab
The Chief Court NWFP
The Chief Court Sindh
None of These
139.
The Governor General Ghulam Mohammad dismissed cabinet of Nazim-ud-din in
1952
1953
1954
None of these
140.
The Governor General Ghulam Mohammad dissolved the constituent assembly on